Tubal Reversal Pregnancy Study Report 2009
Overview
Tubal reversal is the most successful treatment for women wanting to get pregnant after having a tubal ligation. This report presents detailed pregnancy statistics from over 5000 patients at Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center. It is the largest study ever reported about tubal ligation reversal, pregnancies, and pregnancy outcomes.
Introduction
The desire to have a baby after a tubal ligation is common for women in second marriages, following the loss of a child, wanting to restore their bodies to be whole again, and for a variety of other reasons.
Most people are not aware that tubal ligation – usually considered a permanent method of birth control – can be reversed through low cost, one hour outpatient surgery. Even many doctors think mistakenly that treatment by in vitro fertilization (IVF) is needed for women who want another baby after having a tubal sterilization. The results from this study show that tubal reversal at Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center is successful for most women wanting to get pregnant after having their tubes tied.
Tubal Reversal – The Alternative to Treatment by IVF
Information is widely available about in vitro fertilization (IVF) results in the United States from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Tubal reversal pregnancy and birth statistics, however, are difficult to find and generally have been based on small numbers of patients under special study conditions. This report analyzes pregnancy rates and pregnancy outcomes for a very large population of women (5,046) who had tubal reversal procedures at Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center. This is the most detailed study of tubal reversal surgery available on the internet or in medical publications.
Tubal Reversal Pregnancy Study 2009
Table of Contents:
- Overview (this page)
- Study Method
- Patient Population – US States
- Patient Population – Age and Tubal Ligation Procedures
- Pregnancy Rates by Age and Method
- Pregnancy Rates by Tubal Length
- Pregnancy Outcomes
- Tubal Reversal vs. IVF
- About Pregnancy Statistics
September 7th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
[...] The tubal reversal procedures were performed using outpatient mini-laparotomy surgical and anesthetic techniques that minimize tissue injury, blood loss, anesthesia time, postoperative pain, and recovery time. Dr. Berger explains these advanced techniques in a video recording of the surgery entitled Outpatient Tubal Reversal. [...]
September 7th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
[...] When tubal ligation method and average tubal lengths are taken into account simultaneously, it becomes clear that the amount of fallopian tube remaining after a sterilization procedure is the more important factor predicting the chances of getting pregnant after tubal reversal surgery (Table 7). [...]
September 7th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
[...] Tubal reversal has both a higher pregnancy rate and a higher birth rate than IVF for women at any age based on a study from Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal … [...]
September 14th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
[...] Tubal Reversal Pregnancy Study Report 2009 [...]
September 18th, 2009 at 7:11 pm
[...] the pregnancy statistics of IVF vs tubal reversal. You can review the CDC’s study too by the links found [...]
September 18th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
[...] these pregnancy statistics yourself and draw your own conclusions. You can review the CDC’s study too by the links found [...]
December 1st, 2009 at 8:01 am
[...] Hill, NC (PRWEB) September 14, 2009 — Dr. Gary S. Berger today reported the results of the largest study ever performed of tubal reversal surgery, involving over 5000 women. The prospective study concludes that tubal ligation reversal is more [...]
December 4th, 2009 at 9:10 pm
[...] these pregnancy statistics yourself and draw your own conclusions. You can review the CDC’s study too by the links found [...]
January 5th, 2010 at 3:20 am
[...] these pregnancy statistics yourself and draw your own conclusions. You can review the CDC's study too by the links found in [...]